
What exactly does an “envoy” do? That tome of knowledge we know as
Wikipedia tells us it is pretty much a rank down from the Ambassador, but does not detail their roles and responsibilities. When Googled, it seems our ambassadors are losing more and more of their political spotlight, only to make way for headline-rabbing photo-op chasers such as ole’ Blair (press coverage this week is about
his house). There does not appear to be a general “Middle East Ambassador”, so why did Blair not get that title? He’s not as ranked or important as a position that’s non-existent. Sounds about right.
I digress. All of this musing has been sparked off due to the arrival of
George Mitchell in Israel. There does seem to be a little movement on America’s support of the Israeli administration, but with Netanyahu back in the driving seat, there’s currently no hope of separate states.
That said,
Mr. Mitchell has been critical of the Isreali retaliation to the Hamas rocket attacks, but with Hamas unable to hold talks with either Fatah or the Israelis, the end of the week-long Gaza cease fire looks to be a tentative time for Palestinians living in and around Gaza City.
So where does that put things? George Mitchell is going to wade in, tell Netanyahu that separate states are needed, Hamas and Fatah will agree but will then argue amongst themselves about who’s actually to rule it. Netanyahu will ignore these requests and continue with his single state ideals. Mitchell will then get back on a plane and tell the White House that it’s a mess out there. Far beyond any reasonable conclusion, at least one party will have to sacrifice for the other and once again the US are better off not rocking the boat. They want to hold onto that rare Western thing – a Middle East ally.
Mitchell’s visit may be a flash in the pan but while researching, the Jerk has come across our Ambassador out there,
Tom Phillips. My unerring support of Western democracy is elevated by this individual. He has a long history out there and his attitudes and opinions reflect the realities of living in the region. Here are a few quotes from him (
thanks to Cherwell):
‘We have a frank bilateral relationship… and the Israelis know full well that we have significant humanitarian concerns over how they, for example, respond to Hamas’s rocket attacks.’
‘…of course, we understand Israel’s security concerns. And, whilst we’ve always had terrorism in the UK, recent events have made Britons far more aware of what it feels like to have suicide bombers in our midst.’
‘I’m all in favour of demonstrations – as long as they remain within the law – but honestly, I believe discussion is the best way that both students and academics can advance the process.’
“…there is clearly some kind of a link to our present experience of radicalism in the UK.’
‘My role… is partly about finding creative paths to our goal of a two-state solution…. [The UK] has an incredibly detailed regional counter-terrorism strategy. It’s partly about reaching out to those in Islam who want to see different solutions from those which the UK believes will bring lasting peace. And it’s partly about a strategic dialogue with Israel that makes sure we’re prepared for anything.’
And my personal favourite:
‘It is absolutely vital to keep all channels of communication open. Until one understands both narratives, it’s impossible to move towards that common ground where peace is forged.’
Tom, keep up the good work. Civil servants like this are the ones that get the good work done. What has Blair done lately?